AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs AMD A9-9400 SoC
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and AMD A9-9400 SoC processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 2
- Around 63% higher clock speed: 3.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 12 nm FinFET vs 28 nm
- 2.3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2244 vs 1195
- 9.9x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 13190 vs 1329
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 April 2018 vs May 2016 |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Number of cores | 6 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm FinFET vs 28 nm |
| L1 cache | 576 KB vs 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB vs 1024 KB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2244 vs 1195 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 13190 vs 1329 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A9-9400 SoC
- 6.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 49.738 vs 46.475
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 49.738 vs 46.475 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 2600
CPU 2: AMD A9-9400 SoC
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | AMD A9-9400 SoC |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2244 | 1195 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 13190 | 1329 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 974 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 5321 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 3456 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 46.475 | 49.738 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.922 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.759 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.848 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.079 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 894 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1799 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5100 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 894 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1799 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5100 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | AMD A9-9400 SoC | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Zen+ | Stoney Ridge |
| Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | |
| Launch date | 19 April 2018 | May 2016 |
| OPN PIB | YD2600BBAFBOX | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Place in performance rating | 1538 | 1542 |
| Price now | $159.99 | |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 Desktop Processors | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 24.89 | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.4 GHz | |
| Die size | 213 mm | 124 mm |
| L1 cache | 576 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 1024 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm FinFET | 28 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 6 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 12 | |
| Transistor count | 4940 Million | 1200 million |
| Unlocked | ||
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 2933 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM4 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Wraith Stealth | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 x16 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD Ryzen VR-Ready Premium | ||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| AMD StoreMI technology | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Ryzen 5 2600 with others
AMDRyzen 5 2600 vs
AMDPhenom II X4 830
AMDRyzen 5 2600 vs
IntelCeleron G1850
AMDRyzen 5 2600 vs
AMDA9-9400 SoC
AMDRyzen 5 2600 vs
IntelCore i7-7700T
AMDRyzen 5 2600 vs
AMDRyzen 5 1500X
AMDRyzen 5 2600 vs
IntelPentium Silver J5005
