AMD Ryzen 9 3900 vs Intel Core i7-9700K
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 9 3900 and Intel Core i7-9700K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 9 3900
- CPU is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 12 vs 8
- 16 more threads: 24 vs 8
- Around 87655% higher clock speed: 4300 MHz vs 4.90 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 5.3x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.97 vs 9.136
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.748 vs 1.105
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.043 vs 15.67
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 24 Sep 2019 vs October 2018 |
| Number of cores | 12 vs 8 |
| Number of threads | 24 vs 8 |
| Maximum frequency | 4300 MHz vs 4.90 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| L1 cache | 768 KB vs 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6 MB vs 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB vs 12 MB (shared) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.97 vs 9.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.748 vs 1.105 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.043 vs 15.67 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-9700K
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 95 °C
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.695 vs 70.972
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.449 vs 4.924
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 95 °C |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.695 vs 70.972 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.449 vs 4.924 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 9 3900
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-9700K
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 9 3900 | Intel Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.97 | 9.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 70.972 | 195.695 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.748 | 1.105 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.924 | 5.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.043 | 15.67 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2878 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 14474 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1306 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 7386 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 5869 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2156 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1155 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2066 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2156 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1155 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2066 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Ryzen 9 3900 | Intel Core i7-9700K | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 | Coffee Lake |
| Launch date | 24 Sep 2019 | October 2018 |
| OPN Tray | 100-000000070 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1372 | 1350 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $409.99 | |
| Processor Number | i7-9700K | |
| Series | 9th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.64 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3100 MHz | 3.60 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4300 MHz | 4.90 GHz |
| Number of cores | 12 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 24 | 8 |
| Unlocked | ||
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 47.68 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2666 |
Compatibility |
||
| Sockets supported | AM4 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015D (130W) | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 20 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16+x4, 2x8+x4, 1x8+2x4+x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x3E98 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.20 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Ryzen 9 3900 with others
AMDRyzen 9 3900 vs
AMDAthlon II X2 280
AMDRyzen 9 3900 vs
IntelPentium G4600T
AMDRyzen 9 3900 vs
AMDAthlon X4 970
AMDRyzen 9 3900 vs
AMDA4-6320
AMDRyzen 9 3900 vs
IntelCeleron G4930T
AMDRyzen 9 3900 vs
IntelCeleron G5905T
