AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs AMD A10-6790K

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514 and AMD A10-6790K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514

• CPU is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
• Around 42% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 74°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 12 nm vs 32 nm SOI
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1933 vs 1554
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6998 vs 3081

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-6790K

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• Around 16% higher clock speed: 4.3 GHz vs 3.7 GHz
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514
CPU 2: AMD A10-6790K

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1933 1554
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	6998 3081

Compare specifications (specs)