AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs AMD A10-6790K
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and AMD A10-6790K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 12 more cores, run more applications at once: 16 vs 4
- 28 more threads: 32 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2274 vs 1554
- 9x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 27600 vs 3081
- Around 86% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 979 vs 527
- 7.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 10462 vs 1464
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.348 vs 4.233
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 60.995 vs 16.537
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.579 vs 0.536
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 31 July 2017 vs October 2013 |
| Number of cores | 16 vs 4 |
| Number of threads | 32 vs 4 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
| L1 cache | 1536 KB vs 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 8 MB vs 4 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2274 vs 1554 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 27600 vs 3081 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 979 vs 527 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 10462 vs 1464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.348 vs 4.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 60.995 vs 16.537 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.579 vs 0.536 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-6790K
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 4.3 GHz vs 4 GHz
- Around 9% higher maximum core temperature: 74°C vs 68°C
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.913 vs 3.322
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 71.233 vs 26.299
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 4.3 GHz vs 4 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 74°C vs 68°C |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.913 vs 3.322 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.233 vs 26.299 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
CPU 2: AMD A10-6790K
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | AMD A10-6790K |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2274 | 1554 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 27600 | 3081 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 979 | 527 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 10462 | 1464 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 7423 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.348 | 4.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 60.995 | 16.537 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.579 | 0.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.322 | 11.913 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 26.299 | 71.233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2797 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5588 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2797 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5588 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | AMD A10-6790K | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Zen | Richland |
| Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
| Launch date | 31 July 2017 | October 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| OPN PIB | YD195XA8AEWOF | AD679KWOHLBOX |
| OPN Tray | YD195XA8UGAAE | AD679KWOA44HL |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Place in performance rating | 1257 | 1258 |
| Price now | $652.56 | |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper Processors | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.96 | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.4 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Die size | 213 mm | 246 mm |
| L1 cache | 1536 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm SOI |
| Maximum core temperature | 68°C | 74°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 16 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 32 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 9600 million | 1178 million |
| Unlocked | ||
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 4 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2667 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | sTR4 | FM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Not included | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 2.0 |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD Ryzen VR-Ready Premium | ||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| Enmotus FuzeDrive | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 844 MHz | |
| iGPU core count | 384 | |
| Number of pipelines | 384 | |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8670D | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X with others
AMDRyzen Threadripper 1950X vs
AMDA10-6790K
AMDRyzen Threadripper 1950X vs
IntelCore i5-5675C
AMDRyzen Threadripper 1950X vs
AMDAthlon Silver 3050GE
AMDRyzen Threadripper 1950X vs
IntelCeleron G4950
AMDRyzen Threadripper 1950X vs
IntelPentium Gold G5600T
AMDRyzen Threadripper 1950X vs
AMDRyzen Embedded R2514
