Intel Atom x7-Z8700 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
Comparative analysis of Intel Atom x7-Z8700 and Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom x7-Z8700
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1333 vs 1199
- 8.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.722 vs 0.324
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.139 vs 0.094
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 45 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1333 vs 1199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.722 vs 0.324 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.139 vs 0.094 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
- Around 28% higher clock speed: 3.06 GHz vs 2.40 GHz
- Around 17% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 90°C
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1190 vs 651
- 2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 444 vs 220
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 760 vs 753
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 23.559 vs 8.996
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.622 vs 0.519
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.322 vs 1.665
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.06 GHz vs 2.40 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 90°C |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1190 vs 651 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 444 vs 220 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 760 vs 753 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 23.559 vs 8.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.622 vs 0.519 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.322 vs 1.665 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Atom x7-Z8700
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Atom x7-Z8700 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 651 | 1190 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1333 | 1199 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 220 | 444 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 753 | 760 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.722 | 0.324 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.996 | 23.559 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.139 | 0.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.519 | 0.622 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.665 | 2.322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 627 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 974 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1754 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 627 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 974 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1754 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Atom x7-Z8700 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Cherry Trail | Penryn |
| Launch date | Q1'15 | 1 April 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 2819 | 3070 |
| Processor Number | x7-Z8700 | T9900 |
| Series | Intel® Atom™ Processor X Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $530 | |
| Price now | $398.95 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.57 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 3.06 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 105°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.40 GHz | 3.06 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | |
| L2 cache | 6134 KB | |
| Transistor count | 410 million | |
| VID voltage range | 1.050V-1.2125V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
| Supported memory types | LPDDR3 1600 | |
Graphics |
||
| Execution Units | 16 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over eDP | 2560x1600 | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 3840x2160 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 17mm x 17mm | 35mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 2 W | |
| Sockets supported | UTFCBGA1380 | BGA479, PGA478 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 2 | |
| Number of USB ports | 3 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 2x1, 1x2 | |
| USB revision | 3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Atom x7-Z8700 with others
IntelAtom x7-Z8700 vs
IntelCore i7-820QM
IntelAtom x7-Z8700 vs
IntelPentium P6200
IntelAtom x7-Z8700 vs
IntelAtom Z3735G
IntelAtom x7-Z8700 vs
AMDGX-217GA
