Intel Celeron 847 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400

Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 847 and Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 847

  • CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
  • 11x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.701 vs 0.154
  • 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.088 vs 0.043
  • Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.364 vs 0.281
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 19 June 2011 vs 20 August 2008
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm vs 45 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 339 vs 338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.701 vs 0.154
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.088 vs 0.043
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.364 vs 0.281

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400

  • Around 27% higher clock speed: 1.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz
  • Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100
  • 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 17 Watt
  • Around 23% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 582 vs 473
  • Around 7% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 511 vs 479
  • Around 3% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 200 vs 194
  • Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 11.14 vs 10.694
  • Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.04 vs 0.718
Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency 1.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz
Maximum core temperature 105°C vs 100
L2 cache 3072 KB vs 512 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt vs 17 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 582 vs 473
PassMark - CPU mark 511 vs 479
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 200 vs 194
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 11.14 vs 10.694
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1.04 vs 0.718

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Celeron 847
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
473
582
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
479
511
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
194
200
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
339
338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.701
0.154
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
10.694
11.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.088
0.043
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.364
0.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.718
1.04
Name Intel Celeron 847 Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400
PassMark - Single thread mark 473 582
PassMark - CPU mark 479 511
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 194 200
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 339 338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.701 0.154
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 10.694 11.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.088 0.043
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.364 0.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 0.718 1.04

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Celeron 847 Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400

Essentials

Architecture codename Sandy Bridge Penryn
Launch date 19 June 2011 20 August 2008
Launch price (MSRP) $315 $262
Place in performance rating 3280 3282
Price now $315
Processor Number 847 SU9400
Series Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status Launched Discontinued
Value for money (0-100) 0.88
Vertical segment Mobile Mobile

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 1.10 GHz 1.40 GHz
Bus Speed 5 GT/s DMI 800 MHz FSB
Die size 131 mm 107 mm2
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 512 KB 3072 KB
L3 cache 2048 KB
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 45 nm
Maximum core temperature 100 105°C
Maximum frequency 1.1 GHz 1.4 GHz
Number of cores 2 2
Number of threads 2 2
Transistor count 504 million 410 million
Front-side bus (FSB) 800 MHz
VID voltage range 1.050V-1.150V

Memory

Max memory channels 2
Maximum memory bandwidth 21.3 GB/s
Maximum memory size 16 GB
Supported memory types DDR3 1066/1333

Graphics

Graphics base frequency 350 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency 800 MHz
Graphics max frequency 800 MHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)

Graphics interfaces

CRT
DisplayPort
eDP
HDMI
Number of displays supported 2
SDVO

Compatibility

Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1
Package Size 31.0mm x 24.0mm (BGA1023) 22mm x 22mm
Sockets supported FCBGA1023 BGA956
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 17 Watt 10 Watt

Peripherals

Max number of PCIe lanes 16
PCI Express revision 2.0
PCIe configurations 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4

Security & Reliability

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Advanced Technologies

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Idle States
Instruction set extensions Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Fast Memory Access
Intel® Flex Memory Access
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Thermal Monitoring
FSB parity

Virtualization

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare Intel Celeron 847 with others

Intel Celeron 847 Intel
Celeron 847
vs Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 Intel
Core 2 Duo SU9400
Intel Celeron 847 Intel
Celeron 847
vs Intel Atom N570 Intel
Atom N570
Intel Celeron 847 Intel
Celeron 847
vs Intel Atom Z2760 Intel
Atom Z2760