Intel Celeron 847 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 847 and Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 847
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- 11x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.701 vs 0.154
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.088 vs 0.043
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.364 vs 0.281
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 June 2011 vs 20 August 2008 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 339 vs 338 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.701 vs 0.154 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.088 vs 0.043 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.364 vs 0.281 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400
- Around 27% higher clock speed: 1.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100
- 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 17 Watt
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 582 vs 472
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 511 vs 478
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 200 vs 194
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 11.14 vs 10.694
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.04 vs 0.718
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 1.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 100 |
| L2 cache | 3072 KB vs 512 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 17 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 582 vs 472 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 511 vs 478 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 200 vs 194 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.14 vs 10.694 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.04 vs 0.718 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 847
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron 847 | Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 472 | 582 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 478 | 511 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 194 | 200 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 339 | 338 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.701 | 0.154 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.694 | 11.14 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.088 | 0.043 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.364 | 0.281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.718 | 1.04 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron 847 | Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge | Penryn |
| Launch date | 19 June 2011 | 20 August 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $315 | $262 |
| Place in performance rating | 3280 | 3282 |
| Price now | $315 | |
| Processor Number | 847 | SU9400 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 0.88 | |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 800 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 131 mm | 107 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 3072 KB |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 | 105°C |
| Maximum frequency | 1.1 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 504 million | 410 million |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | |
| VID voltage range | 1.050V-1.150V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1066/1333 | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
| SDVO | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 31.0mm x 24.0mm (BGA1023) | 22mm x 22mm |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1023 | BGA956 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 10 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron 847 with others
IntelCeleron 847 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo SU9400
IntelCeleron 847 vs
IntelAtom N570
IntelCeleron 847 vs
IntelAtom Z2760
