Intel Celeron 847 vs Intel Atom N570
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 847 and Intel Atom N570 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 847
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 14% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 473 vs 273
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 480 vs 341
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 194 vs 78
- Around 70% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 339 vs 200
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 June 2011 vs 1 March 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
L1 cache | 128 KB vs 112 KB |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 473 vs 273 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 480 vs 341 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 194 vs 78 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 339 vs 200 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom N570
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 51% higher clock speed: 1.66 GHz vs 1.1 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 89% lower typical power consumption: 8.5 Watt vs 17 Watt
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 1.66 GHz vs 1.1 GHz |
L2 cache | 1 MB vs 512 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 8.5 Watt vs 17 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 847
CPU 2: Intel Atom N570
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron 847 | Intel Atom N570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 473 | 273 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 480 | 341 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 194 | 78 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 339 | 200 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.701 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.694 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.088 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.364 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.718 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron 847 | Intel Atom N570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge | Pineview |
Launch date | 19 June 2011 | 1 March 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $315 | $86 |
Place in performance rating | 3280 | 3294 |
Price now | $315 | $86 |
Processor Number | 847 | N570 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | Legacy Intel Atom® Processors |
Status | Launched | Launched |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.88 | 1.97 |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.66 GHz |
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 2.5 GT/s DMI |
Die size | 131 mm | 87 mm2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 112 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 2048 KB | |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100 | |
Maximum frequency | 1.1 GHz | 1.66 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
Transistor count | 504 million | 176 million |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 666 MHz | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | 1 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 2 GB |
Supported memory types | DDR3 1066/1333 | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 200 MHz |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 800 MHz | |
Graphics max frequency | 800 MHz | |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Processor graphics | Integrated | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
CRT | ||
DisplayPort | ||
eDP | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of displays supported | 2 | |
SDVO | ||
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 31.0mm x 24.0mm (BGA1023) | 22mm x 22mm |
Sockets supported | FCBGA1023 | 437 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 8.5 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |