Intel Celeron 847 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 847 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 847
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher maximum core temperature: 100 vs 71.4°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.701 vs 0.574
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.364 vs 0.094
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 June 2011 vs August 2008 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 vs 71.4°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.701 vs 0.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.364 vs 0.094 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 143% higher clock speed: 2.67 GHz vs 1.1 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 12x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1139 vs 475
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2150 vs 487
- Around 94% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 376 vs 194
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1151 vs 339
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 26.509 vs 10.694
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.136 vs 0.088
- 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.189 vs 0.718
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.67 GHz vs 1.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB vs 512 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1139 vs 475 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2150 vs 487 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 376 vs 194 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1151 vs 339 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 26.509 vs 10.694 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.136 vs 0.088 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.189 vs 0.718 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 847
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron 847 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 475 | 1139 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 487 | 2150 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 194 | 376 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 339 | 1151 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.701 | 0.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.694 | 26.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.088 | 0.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.364 | 0.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.718 | 4.189 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron 847 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge | Yorkfield |
| Launch date | 19 June 2011 | August 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $315 | |
| Place in performance rating | 3290 | 3130 |
| Price now | $315 | $33.98 |
| Processor Number | 847 | Q9400 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 0.88 | 28.99 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.10 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 1333 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 131 mm | 164 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 6144 KB |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 | 71.4°C |
| Maximum frequency | 1.1 GHz | 2.67 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 2 | |
| Transistor count | 504 million | 456 million |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1066/1333 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
| SDVO | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 31.0mm x 24.0mm (BGA1023) | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1023 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 95 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron 847 with others
IntelCeleron 847 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo SU9400
IntelCeleron 847 vs
IntelAtom N570
IntelCeleron 847 vs
IntelAtom Z2760
