Intel Celeron G1620 vs AMD FX-6200
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron G1620 and AMD FX-6200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G1620
- CPU is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1454 vs 1404
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 19.177 vs 15.71
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.878 vs 0.845
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | December 2012 vs February 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1454 vs 1404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.177 vs 15.71 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.878 vs 0.845 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6200
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 2
- 4 more threads: 6 vs 2
- Around 52% higher clock speed: 4.1 GHz vs 2.7 GHz
- 2.3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 12x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 4092 vs 1571
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 513 vs 470
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1934 vs 878
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.114 vs 3.514
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.324 vs 0.19
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.445 vs 1.933
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Number of cores | 6 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 6 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 4.1 GHz vs 2.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 288 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB vs 2048 KB (shared) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 4092 vs 1571 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 513 vs 470 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1934 vs 878 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.114 vs 3.514 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.324 vs 0.19 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.445 vs 1.933 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G1620
CPU 2: AMD FX-6200
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron G1620 | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1454 | 1404 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1571 | 4092 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 470 | 513 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 878 | 1934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.514 | 6.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.177 | 15.71 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.19 | 0.324 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.878 | 0.845 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.933 | 3.445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1528 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1528 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron G1620 | AMD FX-6200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge | Zambezi |
| Launch date | December 2012 | February 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $208 | |
| Place in performance rating | 2730 | 2734 |
| Price now | $153.59 | $339.95 |
| Processor Number | G1620 | |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors |
| Status | Launched | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 4.95 | 5.31 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
| OPN PIB | FD6200FRGUBOX | |
| OPN Tray | FD6200FRW6KGU | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.70 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
| Die size | 94 mm | 315 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 288 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm SOI |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.7 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 6 |
| Maximum core temperature | 61.10°C | |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 V | |
| Transistor count | 1200 million | |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1333 | DDR3 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1155 | AM3+ |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 125 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | 2011C | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | n / a |
| PCIe configurations | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||