Intel Celeron N2920 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000

Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron N2920 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N2920

  • CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100°C
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 45 nm
  • 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 7.5 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.016 vs 0.387
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 December 2013 vs 1 January 2009
Maximum core temperature 105°C vs 100°C
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 45 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 7.5 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.016 vs 0.387

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000

  • 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 60% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 881 vs 552
  • Around 66% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1575 vs 950
  • 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 22.898 vs 7.868
  • Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.118 vs 0.1
Specifications (specs)
L2 cache 6134 KB vs 2 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 881 vs 552
PassMark - CPU mark 1575 vs 950
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 22.898 vs 7.868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.118 vs 0.1

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Celeron N2920
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
552
881
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
950
1575
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.016
0.387
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
7.868
22.898
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.1
0.118
Name Intel Celeron N2920 Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
PassMark - Single thread mark 552 881
PassMark - CPU mark 950 1575
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.016 0.387
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 7.868 22.898
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.1 0.118
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1.508
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1385
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.86
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 301
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 875

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Celeron N2920 Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000

Essentials

Architecture codename Bay Trail Penryn
Launch date 1 December 2013 1 January 2009
Launch price (MSRP) $107 $348
Place in performance rating 3071 3079
Processor Number N2920 Q9000
Series Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status Discontinued Discontinued
Vertical segment Mobile Mobile
Price now $389
Value for money (0-100) 1.91

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 1.86 GHz 2.00 GHz
L1 cache 224 KB
L2 cache 2 MB 6134 KB
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 45 nm
Maximum core temperature 105°C 100°C
Maximum frequency 2.00 GHz 2 GHz
Number of cores 4 4
Number of threads 4 4
Bus Speed 1066 MHz FSB
Die size 107 mm2
Front-side bus (FSB) 1066 MHz
Transistor count 410 million
VID voltage range 1.050V-1.175V

Memory

Max memory channels 2
Maximum memory size 8 GB
Supported memory types DDR3L 1066

Graphics

Graphics base frequency 313 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency 844 MHz
Graphics max frequency 844 MHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Processor graphics Intel HD Graphics

Graphics interfaces

Number of displays supported 2
Wireless Display (WiDi) support

Compatibility

Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1
Package Size 25mm x 27mm 35mm x 35mm
Scenario Design Power (SDP) 4.5 W
Sockets supported FCBGA1170 PGA478
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 7.5 Watt 45 Watt

Peripherals

Max number of PCIe lanes 4
Number of USB ports 5
PCI Express revision 2.0
Total number of SATA ports 2
USB revision 3.0 and 2.0

Security & Reliability

Anti-Theft technology
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection technology
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Advanced Technologies

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST)
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Smart Connect
FSB parity
Intel® Demand Based Switching

Virtualization

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare Intel Celeron N2920 with others

Intel Celeron N2920 Intel
Celeron N2920
vs Intel Pentium 4-M 1.80 Intel
Pentium 4-M 1.80
Intel Celeron N2920 Intel
Celeron N2920
vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000 Intel
Core 2 Quad Q9000
Intel Celeron N2920 Intel
Celeron N2920
vs Intel Core i5-460M Intel
Core i5-460M