Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 and AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 90 nm
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1054 vs 1046
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 991 vs 936
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 340 vs 288
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 593 vs 514
- 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 18.545 vs 3.655
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.092 vs 0.078
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | April 2008 vs February 2007 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 90 nm |
| L2 cache | 3072 KB vs 1024 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1054 vs 1046 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 991 vs 936 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 340 vs 288 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 593 vs 514 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 18.545 vs 3.655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.092 vs 0.078 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
- Around 19% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.53 GHz
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.495 vs 0.275
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.013 vs 1.987
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2.53 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 64 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.495 vs 0.275 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.013 vs 1.987 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1054 | 1046 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 991 | 936 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 340 | 288 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 593 | 514 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.275 | 1.495 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 18.545 | 3.655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.092 | 0.078 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.567 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.987 | 2.013 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Wolfdale | Windsor |
| Launch date | April 2008 | February 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 3169 | 3157 |
| Price now | $75 | $32.50 |
| Processor Number | E7200 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.40 | 14.55 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.53 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | 220 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 3072 KB | 1024 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.53 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 228 million | 227 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | LGA775 | AM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||