Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 vs AMD Phenom X4 9650
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 and AMD Phenom X4 9650 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E7600
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher clock speed: 3.07 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1263 vs 904
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 400 vs 283
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 18.756 vs 8.403
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | May 2009 vs March 2008 |
Maximum frequency | 3.07 GHz vs 2.3 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
L2 cache | 3072 KB vs 512 KB (per core) |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1263 vs 904 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 400 vs 283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 18.756 vs 8.403 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9650
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1713 vs 1165
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 990 vs 702
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.833 vs 0.333
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1713 vs 1165 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 990 vs 702 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.833 vs 0.333 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo E7600
CPU 2: AMD Phenom X4 9650
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 | AMD Phenom X4 9650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1263 | 904 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1165 | 1713 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 400 | 283 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 702 | 990 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.333 | 0.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 18.756 | 8.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.087 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.68 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.414 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Duo E7600 | AMD Phenom X4 9650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Wolfdale | Agena |
Launch date | May 2009 | March 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 3057 | 3047 |
Price now | $119.95 | |
Processor Number | E7600 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.84 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.06 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | |
Die size | 82 mm2 | 285 mm |
L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 3072 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C | |
Maximum frequency | 3.07 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Transistor count | 228 million | 450 million |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Sockets supported | LGA775 | AM2+ |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |