Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7800
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 and Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 970 vs 935
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.259 vs 0.24
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.479 vs 0.408
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 January 2008 vs 18 August 2007 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 100°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 970 vs 935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.259 vs 0.24 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.479 vs 0.408 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T7800
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 4.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1427 vs 321
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2203 vs 535
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 18.982 vs 15.787
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.079 vs 0.075
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.074 vs 1.875
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 3072 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 905 vs 902 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1427 vs 321 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2203 vs 535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 18.982 vs 15.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.079 vs 0.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.074 vs 1.875 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7800
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 970 | 935 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 902 | 905 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 321 | 1427 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 535 | 2203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.259 | 0.24 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.787 | 18.982 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.075 | 0.079 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.479 | 0.408 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.875 | 2.074 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Penryn | Merom |
| Launch date | 10 January 2008 | 18 August 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $241 | $515 |
| Place in performance rating | 3206 | 2816 |
| Price now | $213.99 | $607.99 |
| Processor Number | T8300 | T7800 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.03 | 0.78 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.40 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L2 cache | 3072 KB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 410 million | 291 million |
| VID voltage range | 1.000V-1.250V | 1.075V-1.250V |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Sockets supported | PGA478, BGA479 | PBGA479, PPGA478 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 with others
IntelCore 2 Duo T8300 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo P8600
IntelCore 2 Duo T8300 vs
IntelCore i3-2367M
IntelCore 2 Duo T8300 vs
IntelCore i3-2377M
