Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7200
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 and Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher clock speed: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1022 vs 737
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 988 vs 735
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 352 vs 250
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 601 vs 422
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 January 2008 vs 28 July 2006 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 100°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB vs 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB vs 4096 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1022 vs 737 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 988 vs 735 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 352 vs 250 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 601 vs 422 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T7200
- Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 34 Watt vs 35 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 34 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7200
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1022 | 737 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 988 | 735 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 352 | 250 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 601 | 422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.27 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 20.086 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.079 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.559 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.963 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Penryn | Merom |
| Launch date | 10 January 2008 | 28 July 2006 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $316 | $286 |
| Place in performance rating | 3171 | 2982 |
| Price now | $57.99 | $99.95 |
| Processor Number | T9300 | T7200 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.48 | 3.44 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.50 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 667 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | 667 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB | 4096 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 410 million | 291 million |
| VID voltage range | 1.000V-1.250V | 1.0375V-1.300V |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Sockets supported | PGA478, BGA479 | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 34 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 0 W | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||