Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E7500
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 and Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
- Around 42% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 74.1°C
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1193 vs 1151
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 696 vs 671
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 24.171 vs 18.591
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.097 vs 0.081
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.621 vs 0.602
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 74.1°C |
| L1 cache | 128 KB vs 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 6134 KB vs 3072 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1193 vs 1151 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 696 vs 671 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.171 vs 18.591 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.097 vs 0.081 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.621 vs 0.602 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E7500
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 386 vs 362
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.352 vs 0.31
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.351 vs 2.253
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.93 GHz vs 2.92 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1208 vs 1203 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 386 vs 362 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.352 vs 0.31 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.351 vs 2.253 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E7500
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 | Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1203 | 1208 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1193 | 1151 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 362 | 386 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 696 | 671 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.31 | 0.352 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.171 | 18.591 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.097 | 0.081 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.621 | 0.602 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.253 | 2.351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 | Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Penryn | Wolfdale |
| Launch date | 1 January 2009 | January 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $530 | |
| Place in performance rating | 3086 | 3104 |
| Price now | $423.89 | $14.99 |
| Processor Number | T9800 | E7500 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.40 | 36.85 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.93 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 82 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 6134 KB | 3072 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 74.1°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.92 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | |
| Transistor count | 410 million | 228 million |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | PGA478, BGA479 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 with others
IntelCore 2 Duo T9800 vs
IntelPentium 4-M 1.80
IntelCore 2 Duo T9800 vs
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9000
IntelCore 2 Duo T9800 vs
IntelPentium N3540
