Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) and AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)
- CPU is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 24.255 vs 4.278
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.138 vs 0.086
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | July 2007 vs September 2006 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
L2 cache | 8192 KB vs 1024 KB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.255 vs 4.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.138 vs 0.086 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 89 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.147 vs 0.522
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.147 vs 0.522 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) | AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.522 | 1.147 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.255 | 4.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.138 | 0.086 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.748 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.829 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 266 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 498 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) | AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Kentsfield | Windsor |
Launch date | July 2007 | September 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 3296 | 3297 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $53.09 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.68 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 2x 143 mm | 220 mm |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 8192 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 62 °C | |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Transistor count | 582 million | 154 million |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | 775 | AM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 89 Watt |