Intel Core M-5Y10c vs Intel Celeron 2957U
Comparative analysis of Intel Core M-5Y10c and Intel Celeron 2957U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core M-5Y10c
- CPU is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 43% higher clock speed: 2.00 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 4.5 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1111 vs 780
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1892 vs 855
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.294 vs 6.97
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.247 vs 4.97
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 14.666 vs 5.777
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 857 vs 524
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 857 vs 524
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 December 2014 vs 1 January 2014 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.00 GHz vs 1.4 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| L3 cache | 4 MB vs 2 MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 4.5 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1111 vs 780 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1892 vs 855 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.294 vs 6.97 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.247 vs 4.97 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 14.666 vs 5.777 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 857 vs 524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 857 vs 524 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 2957U
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 95 °C
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 107.823 vs 99.709
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1874 vs 1613
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3071 vs 2750
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1874 vs 1613
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3071 vs 2750
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 95 °C |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 107.823 vs 99.709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1874 vs 1613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3071 vs 2750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1874 vs 1613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3071 vs 2750 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core M-5Y10c
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 2957U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core M-5Y10c | Intel Celeron 2957U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1111 | 780 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1892 | 855 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 471 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 981 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.294 | 6.97 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 99.709 | 107.823 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.643 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.247 | 4.97 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 14.666 | 5.777 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 857 | 524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1613 | 1874 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2750 | 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 857 | 524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1613 | 1874 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2750 | 3071 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core M-5Y10c | Intel Celeron 2957U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Broadwell | Haswell |
| Launch date | 1 December 2014 | 1 January 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $281 | $107 |
| Place in performance rating | 1968 | 1970 |
| Price now | $281 | |
| Processor Number | 5Y10c | 2957U |
| Series | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ M Processors | Intel® Celeron® Processor 2000 Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.95 | |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 800 MHz | 1.40 GHz |
| Die size | 82 mm | |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.00 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 1300 Million | |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Supported memory types | LPDDR3 1333/1600; DDR3L/DDR3L-RS 1600 | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x161E | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 800 MHz | 1.00 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 800 MHz | 1 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 16 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 5300 | Intel HD Graphics |
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 3.5 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 6 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 30mm x 16.5mm | 40mm x 24mm x 1.5mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 3.5 W | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1234 | FCBGA1168 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 12 | 10 |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | x1 (6), x2 (4), x4 (3) | 4x1, 1x4, 1x2 |
| Integrated IDE | ||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
| Number of USB ports | 4 | |
| PCI support | ||
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Intel® Active Management technology (AMT) | ||
| Intel® ME Firmware Version | 9.5 | |
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Matrix Storage | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core M-5Y10c with others
IntelCore M-5Y10c vs
IntelCeleron 2957U
IntelCore M-5Y10c vs
IntelCore i5-4278U
IntelCore M-5Y10c vs
IntelCore i5-7300U
IntelCore M-5Y10c vs
AMDGX-424CC
IntelCore M-5Y10c vs
AMDRX-225FB
IntelCore M-5Y10c vs
AMDR-272F
