Intel Celeron 3765U vs Intel Core M-5Y10c
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 3765U and Intel Core M-5Y10c processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics image quality. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 3765U
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 95 °C
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1171 vs 1128
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 June 2015 vs 1 December 2014 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 95 °C |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1171 vs 1128 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core M-5Y10c
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 5% higher clock speed: 2.00 GHz vs 1.9 GHz
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 4.5 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1901 vs 1252
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 857 vs 691
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 857 vs 691
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1613 vs 1225
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1613 vs 1225
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2750 vs 2168
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2750 vs 2168
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.00 GHz vs 1.9 GHz |
| L3 cache | 4 MB vs 2 MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 4.5 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1901 vs 1252 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 857 vs 691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 857 vs 691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1613 vs 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1613 vs 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2750 vs 2168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2750 vs 2168 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 3765U
CPU 2: Intel Core M-5Y10c
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron 3765U | Intel Core M-5Y10c |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1171 | 1128 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1252 | 1901 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 691 | 857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 691 | 857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1225 | 1613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1225 | 1613 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2168 | 2750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2168 | 2750 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 471 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 981 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.294 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 99.709 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.643 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.247 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 14.666 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron 3765U | Intel Core M-5Y10c | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Broadwell | Broadwell |
| Launch date | 1 June 2015 | 1 December 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $281 |
| Place in performance rating | 1907 | 1897 |
| Processor Number | 3765U | 5Y10c |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor 3000 Series | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ M Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Price now | $281 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.95 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.90 GHz | 800 MHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| Die size | 82 mm | 82 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 95 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 1.9 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 1300 Million | 1300 Million |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333/1600 LPDDR3 1333/1600 | LPDDR3 1333/1600; DDR3L/DDR3L-RS 1600 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 850 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 850 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 5300 |
| Device ID | 0x161E | |
| Max video memory | 16 GB | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 10 W | 3.5 W |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 600 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 40mm x 24mm x 1.3mm | 30mm x 16.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1168 | FCBGA1234 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 4.5 Watt |
| Configurable TDP-up | 6 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 3.5 W | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 12 | 12 |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 4x1 2x4 | x1 (6), x2 (4), x4 (3) |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron 3765U with others
IntelCeleron 3765U vs
IntelCore 2 Duo P7570
IntelCeleron 3765U vs
IntelCore i5-3437U
IntelCeleron 3765U vs
IntelCeleron 2957U
IntelCeleron 3765U vs
AMDGX-424CC
IntelCeleron 3765U vs
AMDRX-225FB
IntelCeleron 3765U vs
AMDR-272F
