Intel Core i5-2415M vs Intel Core 2 Duo P8700
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-2415M and Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-2415M
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 15% higher clock speed: 2.9 GHz vs 2.53 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1198 vs 1022
- 2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1932 vs 962
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 442 vs 336
- Around 64% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 956 vs 584
- 6.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.664 vs 0.273
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 27.27 vs 16.217
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.194 vs 0.076
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.722 vs 0.548
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 February 2011 vs 1 January 2009 |
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 2.9 GHz vs 2.53 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1198 vs 1022 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1932 vs 962 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 442 vs 336 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 956 vs 584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.664 vs 0.273 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 27.27 vs 16.217 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.194 vs 0.076 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.722 vs 0.548 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P8700
- 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.998 vs 1.871
Specifications (specs) | |
L2 cache | 3072 KB vs 512 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.998 vs 1.871 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-2415M
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo P8700
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core i5-2415M | Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1198 | 1022 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1932 | 962 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 442 | 336 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 956 | 584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.664 | 0.273 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 27.27 | 16.217 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.194 | 0.076 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.722 | 0.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.871 | 1.998 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core i5-2415M | Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge | Penryn |
Launch date | 20 February 2011 | 1 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 2969 | 3179 |
Series | Intel Core i5 | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Mobile |
Launch price (MSRP) | $209 | |
Price now | $37.99 | |
Processor Number | P8700 | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.60 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 149 mm | 107 mm2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB | |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 3072 KB |
L3 cache | 3072 KB | |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.9 GHz | 2.53 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
Transistor count | 624 Million | 410 million |
Base frequency | 2.53 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | |
VID voltage range | 1.00V - 1.25V | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Sockets supported | BGA1023 | BGA479, PGA478 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) |