Intel Core i5-2540M vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7800
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-2540M and Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-2540M
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 27% higher clock speed: 3.30 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1408 vs 918
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2365 vs 921
- 8.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.022 vs 0.24
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 29.922 vs 18.982
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.227 vs 0.079
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.797 vs 0.408
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 20 February 2011 vs 18 August 2007 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.30 GHz vs 2.6 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 65 nm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB vs 64 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1408 vs 918 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2365 vs 921 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.022 vs 0.24 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 29.922 vs 18.982 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.227 vs 0.079 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.797 vs 0.408 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T7800
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1427 vs 558
- Around 80% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2203 vs 1221
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.074 vs 2.022
| Specifications (specs) | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 512 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1427 vs 558 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2203 vs 1221 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.074 vs 2.022 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-2540M
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7800
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-2540M | Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1408 | 918 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2365 | 921 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 558 | 1427 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1221 | 2203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.022 | 0.24 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 29.922 | 18.982 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.227 | 0.079 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.022 | 2.074 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.797 | 0.408 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i5-2540M | Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge | Merom |
| Launch date | 20 February 2011 | 18 August 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $266 | $515 |
| Place in performance rating | 2822 | 2817 |
| Price now | $89.97 | $607.99 |
| Processor Number | i5-2540M | T7800 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.38 | 0.78 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.60 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 800 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 149 mm | 143 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.30 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 624 Million | 291 million |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | |
| VID voltage range | 1.075V-1.250V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1066/1333 | |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x116 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.30 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.3 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
| SDVO | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm (rPGA988B); 31mm x 24mm (BGA1023) | 35mm x 35mm |
| Sockets supported | PPGA988, FCBGA1023 | PBGA479, PPGA478 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i5-2540M with others
IntelCore i5-2540M vs
IntelCore Duo T2500
IntelCore i5-2540M vs
IntelCeleron 1000M
IntelCore i5-2540M vs
IntelAtom Z3580
IntelCore i5-2540M vs
AMDGX-217GA
