Intel Core i5-4200M vs Intel Core i7-4800MQ
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-4200M and Intel Core i7-4800MQ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-4200M
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 37 Watt vs 47 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3354 vs 1624
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3318 vs 3280
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3354 vs 1624
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3318 vs 3280
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 37 Watt vs 47 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3354 vs 1624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3318 vs 3280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3354 vs 1624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3318 vs 3280 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- Around 19% higher clock speed: 3.70 GHz vs 3.10 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1914 vs 1619
- 2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 5732 vs 2805
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 830 vs 660
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2934 vs 1425
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.6 vs 6.335
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 13.596 vs 2.624
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.556 vs 0.256
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.378 vs 1.464
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.201 vs 2.387
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1245 vs 1080
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1245 vs 1080
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.70 GHz vs 3.10 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB vs 3072 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1914 vs 1619 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5732 vs 2805 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 830 vs 660 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2934 vs 1425 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.6 vs 6.335 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.596 vs 2.624 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.556 vs 0.256 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.378 vs 1.464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.201 vs 2.387 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1245 vs 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1245 vs 1080 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-4200M
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-4800MQ
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-4200M | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1619 | 1914 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2805 | 5732 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 660 | 830 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1425 | 2934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.335 | 14.6 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2.624 | 13.596 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.256 | 0.556 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.464 | 3.378 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.387 | 5.201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 | 1245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3354 | 1624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3318 | 3280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 | 1245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3354 | 1624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3318 | 3280 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 6463 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i5-4200M | Intel Core i7-4800MQ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Haswell | Haswell |
| Launch date | 4 June 2013 | 1 June 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $225 | $378 |
| Place in performance rating | 1748 | 1737 |
| Price now | $179.99 | $509.95 |
| Processor Number | i5-4200M | i7-4800MQ |
| Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.61 | 4.90 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.50 GHz | 2.70 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| Die size | 130 mm | 177 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1024 KB |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB | 6144 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.10 GHz | 3.70 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 8 |
| Transistor count | 960 Million | 1400 Million |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 100 °C | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333/1600 | DDR3L 1333/1600 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x416 | 0x416 |
| Graphics base frequency | 400 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | 1.30 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.15 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
| VGA | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 3840x2160@60Hz | 2560x1600@60Hz |
| Max resolution over VGA | 2880x1800@60Hz | 1920x1200@60Hz |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm x 4.7mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm x 4.7mm |
| Sockets supported | FCPGA946 | FCPGA946 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 37 Watt | 47 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 3 | 3 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16 or 2x8 or 1x8 2x4 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i5-4200M with others
IntelCore i5-4200M vs
IntelCore i7-3820QM
IntelCore i5-4200M vs
IntelCore i5-4220Y
IntelCore i5-4200M vs
IntelCore i3-1000NG4
IntelCore i5-4200M vs
AMDRyzen Embedded V1500B
