Intel Pentium Silver J5005 vs AMD A9-9400 SoC
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium Silver J5005 and AMD A9-9400 SoC processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium Silver J5005
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 17% higher clock speed: 2.80 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3099 vs 1346
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 990 vs 894
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2236 vs 1799
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 990 vs 894
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2236 vs 1799
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | December 2017 vs May 2016 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.80 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3099 vs 1346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 990 vs 894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2236 vs 1799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 990 vs 894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2236 vs 1799 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A9-9400 SoC
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1219 vs 1205
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5100 vs 3725
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5100 vs 3725
| Specifications (specs) | |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) vs 256K (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1219 vs 1205 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5100 vs 3725 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5100 vs 3725 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium Silver J5005
CPU 2: AMD A9-9400 SoC
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium Silver J5005 | AMD A9-9400 SoC |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1205 | 1219 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3099 | 1346 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 449 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1444 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 990 | 894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2236 | 1799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3725 | 5100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 990 | 894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2236 | 1799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3725 | 5100 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.759 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 49.738 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.848 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.079 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium Silver J5005 | AMD A9-9400 SoC | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Gemini Lake | Stoney Ridge |
| Launch date | December 2017 | May 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1473 | 1464 |
| Price now | $219.92 | |
| Processor Number | J5005 | |
| Series | Intel® Pentium® Silver Processor Series | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.91 | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.50 GHz | |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 1024 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 74 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.80 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | |
| Die size | 124 mm | |
| Transistor count | 1200 million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4/LPDDR4 upto 2400 MT/s | DDR4 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x3184 | |
| Execution Units | 18 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 250 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 605 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| MIPI-DSI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm x 24mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1090 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | 105 deg C | |
Peripherals |
||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Integrated Wireless | Intel® Wireless-AC MAC | |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 6 | |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
| Number of USB ports | 8 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Pentium Silver J5005 with others
IntelPentium Silver J5005 vs
AMDA8-3850
IntelPentium Silver J5005 vs
IntelCore i7-4790K
IntelPentium Silver J5005 vs
IntelPentium G4620
IntelPentium Silver J5005 vs
AMDPRO A6-8570
IntelPentium Silver J5005 vs
AMDRyzen 5 3400G
IntelPentium Silver J5005 vs
IntelCeleron G5900T
