Intel Xeon 3.06 vs Intel Xeon 2.66

Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon 3.06 and Intel Xeon 2.66 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon 3.06

  • CPU is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
  • Around 15% higher clock speed: 3.07 GHz vs 2.66 GHz
  • Around 13% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 491 vs 435
Specifications (specs)
Launch date July 2003 vs November 2002
Maximum frequency 3.07 GHz vs 2.66 GHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark 491 vs 435

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon 2.66

  • 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 89 Watt vs 97 Watt
L1 cache 16 KB vs 8 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 89 Watt vs 97 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Xeon 3.06
CPU 2: Intel Xeon 2.66

PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
491
435
Name Intel Xeon 3.06 Intel Xeon 2.66
PassMark - Single thread mark 0 0
PassMark - CPU mark 491 435

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Xeon 3.06 Intel Xeon 2.66

Essentials

Architecture codename Gallatin Prestonia
Launch date July 2003 November 2002
Place in performance rating 3250 3266
Vertical segment Server Server

Performance

Die size 237 mm 217 mm
L1 cache 8 KB 16 KB
L2 cache 512 KB 512 KB
L3 cache 2048 KB
Manufacturing process technology 130 nm 130 nm
Maximum frequency 3.07 GHz 2.66 GHz
Number of cores 1 1
Transistor count 286 million 55 million

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 2 2
Sockets supported 604 604
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 97 Watt 89 Watt