Intel Xeon 3.06 vs Intel Xeon 2.66
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon 3.06 and Intel Xeon 2.66 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon 3.06
- CPU is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher clock speed: 3.07 GHz vs 2.66 GHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 491 vs 435
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | July 2003 vs November 2002 |
Maximum frequency | 3.07 GHz vs 2.66 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 491 vs 435 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon 2.66
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 89 Watt vs 97 Watt
L1 cache | 16 KB vs 8 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt vs 97 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon 3.06
CPU 2: Intel Xeon 2.66
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Xeon 3.06 | Intel Xeon 2.66 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 0 | 0 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 491 | 435 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Xeon 3.06 | Intel Xeon 2.66 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Gallatin | Prestonia |
Launch date | July 2003 | November 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 3250 | 3266 |
Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
Die size | 237 mm | 217 mm |
L1 cache | 8 KB | 16 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 2048 KB | |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum frequency | 3.07 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 286 million | 55 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
Sockets supported | 604 | 604 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 97 Watt | 89 Watt |