Intel Xeon X3450 vs Intel Xeon 5160
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon X3450 and Intel Xeon 5160 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon X3450
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 7% higher clock speed: 3.20 GHz vs 3 GHz
- Around 12% higher maximum core temperature: 72.7°C vs 65°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.157 vs 0.641
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 58.957 vs 22.544
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.373 vs 0.119
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.72 vs 0.905
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.984 vs 4.713
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 Sep 2009 vs June 2006 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.20 GHz vs 3 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 72.7°C vs 65°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.157 vs 0.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 58.957 vs 22.544 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.373 vs 0.119 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.72 vs 0.905 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.984 vs 4.713 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon 5160
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 95 Watt
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 1 MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon X3450
CPU 2: Intel Xeon 5160
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Xeon X3450 | Intel Xeon 5160 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.157 | 0.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 58.957 | 22.544 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.373 | 0.119 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.72 | 0.905 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.984 | 4.713 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1202 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2402 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 377 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 683 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon X3450 | Intel Xeon 5160 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Lynnfield | Woodcrest |
| Launch date | 8 Sep 2009 | June 2006 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $261 | $22 |
| Place in performance rating | 3093 | 3050 |
| Processor Number | X3450 | 5160 |
| Series | Legacy Intel Xeon Processors | Legacy Intel® Xeon® Processors |
| Vertical segment | Server | Server |
| Price now | $12.82 | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 45.12 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.66 GHz | 3.00 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 2.5 GT/s | 1333 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 296 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 72.7°C | 65°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.20 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 8 | |
| Transistor count | 774 million | 291 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.6500V-1.4000V | B2=1.0V-1.5V, G0=.85V-1.5V |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 800/1066/1333 | DDR2 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | LGA1156 | LGA771 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 0 W | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 4x4 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | 32-bit |
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
