AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 80% higher boost clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1219 MHz
• 451.2x more texture fill rate: 17.60 GTexel/s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 14 nm
• 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

• 2.3x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 4x more pipelines: 512 vs 128
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10229 vs 4822
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 401 vs 265
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1833 vs 1101

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4822 10229
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	265 401
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1101 1833

Compare specifications (specs)