AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 429.3x more texture fill rate: 17.60 GTexel/s vs 41.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 40 nm
- 14x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 210 Watt
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 vs 29 November 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 GTexel/s vs 41.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 210 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 732 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 3.5x more pipelines: 448 vs 128
Core clock speed | 732 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Pipelines | 448 vs 128 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Name | AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5038 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 269 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1113 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.324 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1181.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.978 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.37 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.575 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4590 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2133 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4590 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2133 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4197 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Dragon Range | GF110 |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 | 29 November 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 803 | 801 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $289 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz | |
Compute units | 2 | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 732 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 35.20 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,126 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 563.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 128 | 448 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.800 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 GTexel/s | 41.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 210 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,311.7 gflops | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 1280 MB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 152.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 3800 MHz |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |