AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) vs NVIDIA GeForce 315M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) and NVIDIA GeForce 315M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1212 MHz
- 3134x more texture fill rate: 15.20 GTexel/s vs 4.85 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 128 vs 16
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5038 vs 2910
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 Sep 2022 vs 5 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1212 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.20 GTexel/s vs 4.85 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 16 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5038 vs 2910 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 315M
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 15 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 315M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) | NVIDIA GeForce 315M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5038 | 2910 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 115 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 36 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1401 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1401 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) | NVIDIA GeForce 315M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Mendocino | GT218 |
Launch date | 20 Sep 2022 | 5 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1643 | 1640 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1900 MHz | |
Compute units | 2 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1212 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 30.40 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 972.8 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 486.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 128 | 16 |
Pixel fill rate | 7.600 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 15.20 GTexel/s | 4.85 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 14 Watt |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Floating-point performance | 38.78 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 73 | |
Transistor count | 260 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |