AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) and NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino)

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • 2.7x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 550 MHz
  • 3454.5x more texture fill rate: 15.20 GTexel/s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
  • 16x more pipelines: 128 vs 8
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 65 nm
Launch date 20 Sep 2022 vs 3 June 2008
Core clock speed 1500 MHz vs 550 MHz
Texture fill rate 15.20 GTexel/s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 128 vs 8
Manufacturing process technology 6 nm vs 65 nm

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS

  • Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 15 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 13 Watt vs 15 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS

Name AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
Geekbench - OpenCL 5019
PassMark - G3D Mark 129
PassMark - G2D Mark 46
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 882
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 882

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 610M (Mendocino) NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 2.0 Tesla
Code name Mendocino G98
Launch date 20 Sep 2022 3 June 2008
Place in performance rating 1644 1643
Type Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1900 MHz
Compute units 2
Core clock speed 1500 MHz 550 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 6 nm 65 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 30.40 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 972.8 GFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 486.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 128 8
Pixel fill rate 7.600 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 15.20 GTexel/s 4.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 13 Watt
CUDA cores 8
Floating-point performance 22.4 gflops
Gigaflops 31
Transistor count 210 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors Portable Device Dependent No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor IGP
Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 10.0
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 3.3
Shader Model 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount System Shared 256 MB
Memory bandwidth System Dependent 11.2 GB / s
Memory bus width System Shared 64 Bit
Memory clock speed System Shared 1400 MHz
Memory type System Shared GDDR2, GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA