AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon R9 270
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 780M and AMD Radeon R9 270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3.1x more boost clock speed: 2900 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 1881.1x more texture fill rate: 139.2 GTexel/s vs 74 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 28 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 vs 567
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6998 vs 4306
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 13 November 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s vs 74 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 vs 567 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6998 vs 4306 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74175 vs 27793
- 3.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1603 vs 480
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74175 vs 27793 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1603 vs 480 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 780M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 780M | AMD Radeon R9 270 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27793 | 74175 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 | 567 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6998 | 4306 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 480 | 1603 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.721 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1282.039 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.927 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 93.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 261.843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3448 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3448 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 780M | AMD Radeon R9 270 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Phoenix | Curacao |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 13 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 240 | 501 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz | 925 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 92.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s | 74 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2,368 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 210 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 179.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |