AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 780M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 76% higher boost clock speed: 2900 MHz vs 1645 MHz
- 661x more texture fill rate: 139.2 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 16 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 vs 603
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 15 August 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 vs 603 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
- Around 71% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47476 vs 27793
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10465 vs 6998
- 11.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5536 vs 480
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47476 vs 27793 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 vs 6998 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5536 vs 480 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 780M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 780M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27793 | 47476 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 | 603 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6998 | 10465 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 480 | 5536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 780M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Phoenix | GP104B |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 240 | 290 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $389.99 | |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Type | Laptop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 92.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s | 210.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 256 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 8 GB/s |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |