AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 780M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1481 MHz
- Around 83% higher boost clock speed: 2900 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- 392.8x more texture fill rate: 139.2 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 16 nm
- 16.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 10 March 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1481 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- 4.7x more pipelines: 3584 vs 768
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67595 vs 27873
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 871
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18565 vs 7059
- 3.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9874 vs 2769
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67595 vs 27873 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 vs 871 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18565 vs 7059 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9874 vs 2769 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 780M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 780M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27873 | 67595 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 871 | 934 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7059 | 18565 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2769 | 9874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 780M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Phoenix | GP102 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 10 March 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 204 | 206 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $826.98 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 92.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 11 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 484.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 352 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 11008 MHz |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |