AMD Radeon Pro W6600X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 2068 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 16967.9x more texture fill rate: 317.3 GTexel/s vs 18.7 billion / sec
- 5.8x more pipelines: 2048 vs 352
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1200 MHz
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 25 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 2068 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 317.3 GTexel/s vs 18.7 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 352 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1200 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 120 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67420 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1617 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 458 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6600X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Navi 23 | GF100 |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 25 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 301 | 299 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2479 MHz | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 2068 MHz | 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 352 |
Pixel fill rate | 158.7 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 317.3 GTexel/s | 18.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 3,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 598.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | Apple MPX | MXM-B (3.0) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 API |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |