AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon RX 6400

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6400

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1923 MHz vs 1290 MHz
Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1392 MHz
1914.1x more texture fill rate: 111.4 GTexel/s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 14 nm
Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 53 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 717 vs 457
Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7651 vs 5029
Around 44% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 176 vs 122
Around 89% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33004 vs 17466

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	19 Jan 2022 vs 25 October 2016
Core clock speed	1923 MHz vs 1290 MHz
Boost clock speed	2321 MHz vs 1392 MHz
Texture fill rate	111.4 GTexel/s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	53 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	717 vs 457
PassMark - G3D Mark	7651 vs 5029
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	176 vs 122
Geekbench - OpenCL	33004 vs 17466

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

3.5x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective

Memory clock speed	7008 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

717

457

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7651

5029

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

176

122

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

33004

17466

Name	AMD Radeon RX 6400	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark	717	457
PassMark - G3D Mark	7651	5029
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	176	122
Geekbench - OpenCL	33004	17466
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		223.683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3360

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 6400	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Pascal
Code name	Navi 24	GP107
Launch date	19 Jan 2022	25 October 2016
Place in performance rating	279	586
Launch price (MSRP)		$109
Price now		$124.99
Type		Desktop
Value for money (0-100)		56.95
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2321 MHz	1392 MHz
Compute units	12
Core clock speed	1923 MHz	1290 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	222.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	7.130 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.565 TFLOPS
Pipelines	768	640
Pixel fill rate	74.27 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	111.4 GTexel/s	58.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	53 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	5400 million	3,300 million
CUDA cores		640
Floating-point performance		1,862 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature		97 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Single-slot
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 3.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU)	250 Watt	300 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Height		4.38" (11.1 cm)
Length		5.7" (14.5 cm)
Width		2-slot
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	112 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective	7008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
GameStream
GPU Boost
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
ShadowWorks
VR Ready