AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1923 MHz vs 1464 MHz
- 2537.6x more texture fill rate: 111.4 GTexel/s vs 43.9 billion / sec
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 768 vs 480
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.1x lower typical power consumption: 53 Watt vs 219 Watt
- 3.2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1280 MB
- Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1900 MHz (3800 data rate)
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 717 vs 475
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7651 vs 3931
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33004 vs 13443
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 vs 7 December 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1923 MHz vs 1464 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s vs 43.9 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 768 vs 480 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt vs 219 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1280 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 717 vs 475 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7651 vs 3931 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33004 vs 13443 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 717 | 475 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7651 | 3931 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 176 | 0 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33004 | 13443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.849 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.185 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.369 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.953 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4862 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4862 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 24 | GF110 |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 7 December 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 279 | 708 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Price now | $99.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 48.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz | |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1923 MHz | 1464 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.565 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 480 |
Pixel fill rate | 74.27 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s | 43.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt | 219 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | 3,000 million |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,405.4 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1280 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 152.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |