AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1923 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 53 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 vs 1 Dec 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1923 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 111.4 GTexel/s
- 6.3x more pipelines: 4864 vs 768
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 717
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 7651
- 15.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 176
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 33004
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 111.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 768 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 717 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 7651 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 33004 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 717 | 989 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7651 | 20394 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 176 | 2671 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33004 | 109075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 24 | GA104 |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 1 Dec 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 279 | 104 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1923 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1) | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.565 TFLOPS | 16.20 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 768 | 4864 |
Pixel fill rate | 74.27 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | 350 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |