AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- 2.6x more boost clock speed: 2815 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- 4152.1x more texture fill rate: 180.2 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 449.6x more memory clock speed: 2248 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 5.4 GB/s
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 812 vs 521
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9583 vs 3901
- 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 48727 vs 11526
- 2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 235 vs 117
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 vs 18 February 2014 |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2815 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 180.2 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2248 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 5.4 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 vs 521 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9583 vs 3901 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 48727 vs 11526 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 235 vs 117 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Around 78% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 107 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 107 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 | 521 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9583 | 3901 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 48727 | 11526 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 235 | 117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Navi 24 | GM107 |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 18 February 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 216 | 707 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $299.01 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2815 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Compute units | 16 | |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 360.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.53 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.765 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 90.08 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 180.2 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 107 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | 1,870 million |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 143.9 GB/s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2248 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 5.4 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |