AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 2055 MHz vs 941 MHz
- 2.7x more boost clock speed: 2635 MHz vs 967 MHz
- 3114.5x more texture fill rate: 337.3 GTexel/s vs 108.3 GTexel / s
- Around 52% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1344
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 914 vs 279
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17137 vs 3496
- Around 39% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1859 vs 1336
- 6.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 87479 vs 12758
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 May 2022 vs 12 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 2055 MHz vs 941 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2635 MHz vs 967 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 337.3 GTexel/s vs 108.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1344 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 914 vs 279 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17137 vs 3496 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1859 vs 1336 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87479 vs 12758 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
- Around 76% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 176 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 176 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 914 | 279 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17137 | 3496 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1859 | 1336 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87479 | 12758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Navi 23 | GK104 |
Launch date | 10 May 2022 | 12 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 106 | 691 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2635 MHz | 967 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 2055 MHz | 941 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 674.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.59 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.79 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1344 |
Pixel fill rate | 168.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 337.3 GTexel/s | 108.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 176 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 280.3 GB/s | 120.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2190 MHz, 17.5 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |