AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 2150 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 416.0 GTexel/s vs 386.3 GTexel/s
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 970 vs 931
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 2150 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 416.0 GTexel/s vs 386.3 GTexel/s |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 970 vs 931 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.9x more pipelines: 7424 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 24971 vs 20765
- Around 64% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4179 vs 2548
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 159976 vs 107434
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 3 Mar 2022 |
Pipelines | 7424 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 7 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 24971 vs 20765 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4179 vs 2548 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 159976 vs 107434 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 970 | 931 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20765 | 24971 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2548 | 4179 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107434 | 159976 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 359.653 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7156.733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.495 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.072 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 866.201 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | Navi 22 | AD104 |
Launch date | 3 Mar 2022 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 92 | 49 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2600 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 2150 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 832.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | 386.3 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.62 TFLOPS (2:1) | 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.31 TFLOPS | 24.72 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 7424 |
Pixel fill rate | 166.4 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 416.0 GTexel/s | 386.3 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 35800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | IGP |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 110 mm, 4.3 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |