AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1335 MHz
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 2394 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 804.4 GTexel/s vs 515.3 GTexel/s
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 20 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1179 vs 975
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 28846 vs 27725
- Around 26% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 27044 vs 21530
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1335 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2394 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 804.4 GTexel/s vs 515.3 GTexel/s |
Maximum memory size | 20 GB vs 16 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1179 vs 975 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 28846 vs 27725 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 27044 vs 21530 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 81% higher pipelines: 9728 vs 5376
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 5 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 180987 vs 169473
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 3 Nov 2022 |
Pipelines | 9728 vs 5376 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 5 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 180987 vs 169473 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1179 | 975 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 28846 | 27725 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 27044 | 21530 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 169473 | 180987 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 343.519 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 12483.531 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.185 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2714.187 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | Navi 31 | AD103 |
Launch date | 3 Nov 2022 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 17 | 20 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2394 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Compute units | 84 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1335 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 3.218 TFLOPS (1:16) | 515.3 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 103.0 TFLOPS (2:1) | 32.98 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 51.48 TFLOPS | 32.98 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 5376 | 9728 |
Pixel fill rate | 459.6 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 804.4 GTexel/s | 515.3 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 57700 million | 45900 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | IGP |
Height | 51 mm, 2 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 276 mm, 10.9 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Width | 135 mm, 5.3 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 20 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 800.0 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 320 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |