AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX and AMD Radeon Pro W5700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 2499 MHz vs 1930 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 959.6 GTexel/s vs 277.9 GTexel/s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 6144 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 7 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1255 vs 904
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 31122 vs 14707
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 189258 vs 69290
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Nov 2022 vs 19 Nov 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2499 MHz vs 1930 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 959.6 GTexel/s vs 277.9 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 2304 |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 7 nm |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1255 vs 904 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 31122 vs 14707 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 189258 vs 69290 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 205 Watt vs 355 Watt
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt vs 355 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1255 | 904 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 31122 | 14707 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6841 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 189258 | 69290 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 492.964 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 14101.507 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 65.586 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 461.69 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2659.85 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | Navi 31 | Navi 10 |
Launch date | 3 Nov 2022 | 19 Nov 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 9 | 206 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2499 MHz | 1930 MHz |
Compute units | 96 | 36 |
Core clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1243 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 3.838 TFLOPS (1:16) | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 122.8 TFLOPS (2:1) | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 61.42 TFLOPS | 8.893 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 479.8 GPixel/s | 123.5 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 959.6 GTexel/s | 277.9 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 355 Watt | 205 Watt |
Transistor count | 57700 million | 10300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 51 mm, 2 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 287 mm, 11.3 inches | 12 inches (305 mm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 135 mm, 5.3 inches | Dual-slot |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 960.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |