AMD FirePro 2270 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro 2270 and NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro 2270
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 459 MHz
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 4.8 GTexel / s vs 3.67 GTexel / s
- 10x more pipelines: 80 vs 8
- 6.5x better floating-point performance: 96 gflops vs 14.688 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 128 MB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 142 vs 115
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 173 vs 111
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1231 vs 441
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1231 vs 441
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 January 2011 vs 17 April 2007 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 459 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4.8 GTexel / s vs 3.67 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 80 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 96 gflops vs 14.688 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 142 vs 115 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 173 vs 111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1231 vs 441 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1231 vs 441 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro 2270
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro 2270 | NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 142 | 115 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 173 | 111 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2564 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.145 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.382 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 539 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 539 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1231 | 441 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1231 | 441 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro 2270 | NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Cedar | G86 |
Launch date | 31 January 2011 | 17 April 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1540 | 1543 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 459 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 96 gflops | 14.688 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 4.8 GTexel / s | 3.67 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DMS-59 | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |