AMD Radeon HD 6350 vs AMD FirePro 2270
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6350 and AMD FirePro 2270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6350
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 5.2 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 104 gflops vs 96 gflops
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2872 vs 2564
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.154 vs 0.145
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 10.131 vs 9.382
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 734 vs 539
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1717 vs 1231
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 734 vs 539
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1717 vs 1231
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 104 gflops vs 96 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2872 vs 2564 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.154 vs 0.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.131 vs 9.382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 734 vs 539 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1717 vs 1231 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 734 vs 539 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1717 vs 1231 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro 2270
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 142 vs 141
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 173 vs 171
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 19 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 142 vs 141 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 173 vs 171 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6350
GPU 2: AMD FirePro 2270
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6350 | AMD FirePro 2270 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 141 | 142 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 173 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2872 | 2564 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.154 | 0.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.131 | 9.382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 381 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 734 | 539 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1717 | 1231 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 381 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 734 | 539 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1717 | 1231 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6350 | AMD FirePro 2270 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Cedar | Cedar |
Launch date | 7 February 2011 | 31 January 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $23 | |
Place in performance rating | 1539 | 1540 |
Price now | $50.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104 gflops | 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 170 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |