AMD FirePro 2270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro 2270 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro 2270
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 23 Watt
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 173 vs 94
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2564 vs 1861
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 9.382 vs 8.015
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 23 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 173 vs 94 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2564 vs 1861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.382 vs 8.015 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
- 2x more texture fill rate: 9.6 billion / sec vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 96 vs 80
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 230.4 gflops vs 96 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 461 vs 142
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.355 vs 0.145
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1338 vs 539
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1338 vs 539
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2623 vs 1231
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2623 vs 1231
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 9.6 billion / sec vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 230.4 gflops vs 96 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 461 vs 142 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.355 vs 0.145 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1338 vs 539 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1338 vs 539 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2623 vs 1231 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2623 vs 1231 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro 2270
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro 2270 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 142 | 461 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 173 | 94 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2564 | 1861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.145 | 0.355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.382 | 8.015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 539 | 1338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 539 | 1338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1231 | 2623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1231 | 2623 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.099 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 131.334 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.733 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 911 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 911 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro 2270 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Cedar | GF108 |
| Launch date | 31 January 2011 | 5 January 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1539 | 1540 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 96 gflops | 230.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 80 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.8 GTexel / s | 9.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 23 Watt |
| Transistor count | 292 million | 585 million |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DMS-59 | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD FirePro 2270 with others
AMDFirePro 2270 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600M GS
AMDFirePro 2270 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 250M
AMDFirePro 2270 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 525M
AMDFirePro 2270 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6350
AMDFirePro 2270 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8330E
AMDFirePro 2270 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8240
