AMD FirePro A300 vs AMD FirePro A320
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro A300 and AMD FirePro A320 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro A300
- Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro A320
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 760 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 955 MHz vs 905 MHz
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 760 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 955 MHz vs 905 MHz |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro A300 | AMD FirePro A320 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale 3 |
| Code name | Trinity GL | Trinity GL |
| Launch date | 6 June 2012 | 6 June 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 905 MHz | 955 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 760 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,303 million | 1,303 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |