AMD FirePro A300 vs AMD FirePro A320

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro A300 and AMD FirePro A320 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro A300

  • Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 100 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro A320

  • Around 5% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 760 MHz
  • Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 955 MHz vs 905 MHz
Core clock speed 800 MHz vs 760 MHz
Boost clock speed 955 MHz vs 905 MHz

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD FirePro A300 AMD FirePro A320

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 3 TeraScale 3
Code name Trinity GL Trinity GL
Launch date 6 June 2012 6 June 2012
Place in performance rating not rated not rated
Type Workstation Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 905 MHz 955 MHz
Core clock speed 760 MHz 800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 32 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 1,303 million 1,303 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.4 4.4

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare AMD FirePro A300 with others

AMD FirePro A300 AMD
FirePro A300
vs AMD Radeon HD 7310 IGP AMD
Radeon HD 7310 IGP
AMD FirePro A300 AMD
FirePro A300
vs AMD Radeon HD 7290 IGP AMD
Radeon HD 7290 IGP
AMD FirePro A300 AMD
FirePro A300
vs AMD FirePro A320 AMD
FirePro A320