AMD FirePro D300 vs Intel HD Graphics P4600
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro D300 and Intel HD Graphics P4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20181 vs 3372
- 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 51.183 vs 8.915
- 8.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1192.547 vs 146.479
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.209 vs 1.178
- 7.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.541 vs 10.689
- 36.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 242.179 vs 6.64
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3397 vs 3342
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3397 vs 3342
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 January 2014 vs 1 June 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20181 vs 3372 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.183 vs 8.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1192.547 vs 146.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.209 vs 1.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.541 vs 10.689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 242.179 vs 6.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3397 vs 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3397 vs 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3345 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4600
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 84 Watt vs 150 Watt
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro D300
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4600
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro D300 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20181 | 3372 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.183 | 8.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1192.547 | 146.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.209 | 1.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.541 | 10.689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 242.179 | 6.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6054 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3397 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6054 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3397 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3345 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 605 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro D300 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 7.5 |
| Code name | Pitcairn | Haswell GT2 |
| Launch date | 18 January 2014 | 1 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 683 | 684 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,176 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | |
| Texture fill rate | 68 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 84 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 392 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Length | 242 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 162.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD FirePro D300 with others
AMDFirePro D300 vs
IntelHD Graphics 2000
AMDFirePro D300 vs
AMDFirePro S9000
AMDFirePro D300 vs
IntelHD Graphics P4600
AMDFirePro D300 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 455
AMDFirePro D300 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 (Laptop)
AMDFirePro D300 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
