Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs AMD FirePro D300
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and AMD FirePro D300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3397
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3397
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 vs 18 January 2014 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D300
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 20x more pipelines: 1280 vs 64
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6054 vs 3751
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6054 vs 3751
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 64 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6054 vs 3751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6054 vs 3751 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D300
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | AMD FirePro D300 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3751 | 6054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3751 | 6054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3351 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19628 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.183 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1192.547 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.209 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.541 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 242.179 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | AMD FirePro D300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 18 January 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 670 | 675 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.25 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.12 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 64 | 1280 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 2,176 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 68 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 162.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 242 mm | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) with others
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
ATIRadeon X1550
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7610M
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M600M
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs
AMDRadeon Pro 455
