AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD FirePro S9000

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro D300 and AMD FirePro S9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

AMD FirePro D300

AMD FirePro S9000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D300

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
2.3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 350 Watt
5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 51.183 vs 9.541
4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1192.547 vs 275.278
2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.209 vs 1.886
2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.541 vs 30.049
2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 242.179 vs 91.842

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 January 2014 vs 24 August 2012
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt vs 350 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	51.183 vs 9.541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1192.547 vs 275.278
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.209 vs 1.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	78.541 vs 30.049
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	242.179 vs 91.842

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9000

Around 6% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 850 MHz
Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel / s vs 68 GTexel / s
Around 40% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1280
Around 48% better floating-point performance: 3,226 gflops vs 2,176 gflops
3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 5080 MHz
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 3397
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 3397

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	900 MHz vs 850 MHz
Texture fill rate	100.8 GTexel / s vs 68 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1792 vs 1280
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops vs 2,176 gflops
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz vs 5080 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3707 vs 3397
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3707 vs 3397
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 vs 3351

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro D300
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9000

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

51.183

9.541

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1192.547

275.278

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.209

1.886

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

78.541

30.049

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

242.179

91.842

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3397

3707

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3351

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3397

3707

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3351

3357

Name	AMD FirePro D300	AMD FirePro S9000
Geekbench - OpenCL	20181
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	51.183	9.541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1192.547	275.278
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.209	1.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	78.541	30.049
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	242.179	91.842
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6054
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3397	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3351	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6054
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3397	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3351	3357
PassMark - G3D Mark		5059
PassMark - G2D Mark		561

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD FirePro D300	AMD FirePro S9000
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Pitcairn	Tahiti
Launch date	18 January 2014	24 August 2012
Place in performance rating	683	685
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$2,499
Technical info
Core clock speed	850 MHz	900 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,176 gflops	3,226 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1280	1792
Texture fill rate	68 GTexel / s	100.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt	350 Watt
Transistor count	2,800 million	4,313 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort count		1
Dual-link DVI support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	242 mm	267 mm
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Form factor		Full Height / Full Length
Supplementary power connectors		1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	162.6 GB / s	264 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz	5500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5