AMD FirePro D300 versus Intel HD Graphics P4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro D300 and Intel HD Graphics P4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro D300
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- 2.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20181 versus 3372
- 5.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 51.183 versus 8.915
- 8.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1192.547 versus 146.479
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.209 versus 1.178
- 7.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.541 versus 10.689
- 36.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 242.179 versus 6.64
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3397 versus 3342
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3397 versus 3342
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 January 2014 versus 1 June 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20181 versus 3372 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.183 versus 8.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1192.547 versus 146.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.209 versus 1.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.541 versus 10.689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 242.179 versus 6.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3397 versus 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3397 versus 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3345 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 79% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 84 Watt versus 150 Watt
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro D300
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4600
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD FirePro D300 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20181 | 3372 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.183 | 8.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1192.547 | 146.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.209 | 1.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.541 | 10.689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 242.179 | 6.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6054 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3397 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6054 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3397 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3345 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 605 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD FirePro D300 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 7.5 |
| Nom de code | Pitcairn | Haswell GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 18 January 2014 | 1 June 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 683 | 684 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,176 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 68 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 84 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 392 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Longeur | 242 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 162.6 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD FirePro D300 avec des autres
AMDFirePro D300 vs
IntelHD Graphics 2000
AMDFirePro D300 vs
AMDFirePro S9000
AMDFirePro D300 vs
IntelHD Graphics P4600
AMDFirePro D300 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 455
AMDFirePro D300 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 (Laptop)
AMDFirePro D300 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
