AMD FirePro D300 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro D300 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

AMD FirePro D300

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D300

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
4.3x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 200 MHz
6.5x more texture fill rate: 68 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
32x more pipelines: 1280 vs 40
20.9x better floating-point performance: 2,176 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19872 vs 5083
2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6054 vs 2095
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3397 vs 3285
2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6054 vs 2095
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3397 vs 3285

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 January 2014 vs 27 May 2013
Core clock speed	850 MHz vs 200 MHz
Texture fill rate	68 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1280 vs 40
Floating-point performance	2,176 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	19872 vs 5083
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6054 vs 2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3397 vs 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6054 vs 2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3397 vs 3285

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 150 Watt

Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 150 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro D300
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

19872

5083

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6054

2095

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3397

3285

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6054

2095

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3397

3285

Name	AMD FirePro D300	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Geekbench - OpenCL	19872	5083
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	51.183
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1192.547
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	78.541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	242.179
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6054	2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3397	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6054	2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3397	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3351
PassMark - G3D Mark		1180
PassMark - G2D Mark		390

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD FirePro D300	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Generation 7.5
Code name	Pitcairn	Haswell GT3e
Launch date	18 January 2014	27 May 2013
Place in performance rating	660	661
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	850 MHz	200 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,176 gflops	104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	1280	40
Texture fill rate	68 GTexel / s	10.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt	30 Watt
Transistor count	2,800 million	392 million
Boost clock speed		1300 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	242 mm
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	162.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	eDRAM
Shared memory		1
Technologies
Quick Sync