AMD FirePro M3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310M

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M3900 and NVIDIA GeForce 310M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M3900

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 6 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
  • 10x more pipelines: 160 vs 16
  • 4.9x better floating-point performance: 240 gflops vs 48.96 gflops
  • Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4446 vs 2949
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 19 October 2010 vs 10 January 2010
Texture fill rate 6 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
Pipelines 160 vs 16
Floating-point performance 240 gflops vs 48.96 gflops
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 4446 vs 2949

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 310M

  • 2x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 750 MHz
  • Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 20 Watt
Core clock speed 1530 MHz vs 750 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 14 Watt vs 20 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro M3900
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 310M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4446
2949
Name AMD FirePro M3900 NVIDIA GeForce 310M
Geekbench - OpenCL 4446 2949
PassMark - G3D Mark 113
PassMark - G2D Mark 23
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1167
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1167

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD FirePro M3900 NVIDIA GeForce 310M

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Tesla 2.0
Code name Seymour GT218
Launch date 19 October 2010 10 January 2010
Place in performance rating 1652 1653
Type Mobile workstation Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 750 MHz
Core clock speed 750 MHz 1530 MHz
Floating-point performance 240 gflops 48.96 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 160 16
Texture fill rate 6 GTexel / s 5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt 14 Watt
Transistor count 370 million 260 million
CUDA cores 16
Gigaflops 73

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support n / a PCI-E 2.0
Form factor chip-down
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 10.1
OpenGL 4.4 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 14 GB / s 12.64 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR3 GDDR3, DDR3
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
CUDA
HybridPower
Power management 8.0